feremvp.blogg.se

Behringer ada8200 digi 003
Behringer ada8200 digi 003







behringer ada8200 digi 003
  1. #Behringer ada8200 digi 003 Patch#
  2. #Behringer ada8200 digi 003 pro#
  3. #Behringer ada8200 digi 003 software#
  4. #Behringer ada8200 digi 003 plus#

I set the input levels of the analogue inputs and accessed the sound through the Motu software or as inputs 9-16 in my DAW. Since I've had the unit I have to confess that I have barely noticed it. I'm sure It couldn't push the cost up too far to move to a 2U unit and tuck everything away at the back, perhaps with a couple of inputs at the front as other manufacturers seems to do.

#Behringer ada8200 digi 003 Patch#

This means I need to use a patch bay and cables in order to keep the clutter of leads at the back. These are all located in the front with only the outputs located on the rear panel. I would have preferred for there to be fewer mic inputs in order to make space round the back of the unit for the inputs. I am only using the line inputs so I can't comment on the Midas mic pre-amps but it's nice to have these for when/if I record some vox in the future. I ended up following the setup done by the reviewer in Sound on Sound magazine, which is where I had read about the unit in the first place. Hooking it up to the Motu was easy, but the documentation supplied is a bit thin in content. The unit itself is one rack unit high and seems sturdily made and looks good in the rack. Also it is a good way of future proofing my project studio as my needs change.

behringer ada8200 digi 003

I ordered the ADA8200 to expand the I/O on my Motu 828 MkII as I have 5 synths that I like to use and don't want the hassle of plugging and unplugging them. Great product and great service once again from Thomann! If you want more features, then you are going to have to spend quite a lot more, simples.

behringer ada8200 digi 003

I am not going to criticise the lack of features on this box, as that would be very unfair. Being able to now simultaneously record up to 8 audio sources on separate tracks within Cubase is absolutely brilliant, I am overjoyed I now have this flexibility as I am a one-man musician with 16 external synths and love to jam.īuild quality of the Behringer seems to be really good, I can't believe they can produce equpment like this for the price. In my case, I configured the Babyface in Cubase to slave off of the ADA8200 and then added the ADAT buses in the Cubase Device menu. The hardware could not be easier to setup, the trick is making sure that you either slave your audio interface off of the ADA82000, or make your audio interface the master.

#Behringer ada8200 digi 003 plus#

The ADA8200 is by far the cheapest option on the market to give you 8 analogue channels, 8 in plus 8 out via the ADAT Lightpipe optical interface. I have been totally blind to the ADAT interface on the Babyface until I started reading what you could do with this to expand analogue channels going into your DAW from the outside world utilising an A to D to A convertor such as the Behringer ADA8200 Ultragain. Hardware I have the excellent RME Babyface and I use Cubase. Anyone who has issues with this has misunderstood its purpose.įor years I have been frustrated by only being able to record a maximum of two tracks in my DAW. Pros: Easy setup, flat uncoloured sound, quiet preamps, separate line-in inputs on every channelĬons: There are none at this price point. This is an inexpensive expansion purely for when you need more tracks, like tracking a live band or recording drums. Nobody is buying this as a single channel preamp for vocals, so comparing singing tracks or solo instruments is pointless. The fact that it's ADAT and needs a host interface to piggy back off means that people only buy this because they need more channels for drums and multi-tracking. when you can't hear the difference anyway? It's disingenuous to do an A/B test on something it was not designed to do. Why blow thousands on something which only gets used on extra toms etc. you can hear differences but it's all about choosing the right tool for the right job. Maybe on a quiet intimate vocal or subtle strings etc. For loud sound sources like drums and cranked amps, I can't hear the difference between these midas preamps and the Saffire ones.

#Behringer ada8200 digi 003 pro#

I use my Audient for single channel stuff and the Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 + Behringer for drums and multi tracking. I don't care for hyped bass or mid range etc., everybody EQ's later anyway so I don't understand the fuss about having a coloured sound right out of the box. I wish people would understand that this is not designed for single channel preamp stuff like lead vocals!!! Yes, it's flat sounding, but that's what I like about it.









Behringer ada8200 digi 003